Electable
Feb 11, 2016 7:53:32 GMT -5
Post by Dr. Sean Neville on Feb 11, 2016 7:53:32 GMT -5
Sean frowned at that and started the vacuum cleaner. The appliance roared to life, and he began with the carpet around the bar, since they spent enough time in that area that they had dropped crumbs here and there. Then he moved on to the sofa that his partner had occupied with Mopsy mere moments ago. She was a quiet, unassuming pet, but she remained covered in fur with a tendency to shed. Particularly in the middle of January when she still had her winter coat.
The telepath found it uncharacteristic that his partner would refuse to watch the caucus results. While he knew that Josh felt so passionately about politics that he could fall into a funk (although, so often, it ignited a fire in the attorney’s belly so that he argued and yelled instead), the attorney remained a political junkie. Anyone who had ever shared more than a five-minute conversation with him knew that.
If he wins, do you want to have slept through it?
Sean (mostly) followed the same media that his partner did. Josh read blogs more frequently than the telepath did, and he read (and replied to) the comments section, something that the psychiatrist would never do, but, overall, they had the same preferences for media: MSNBC, Mother Jones, The New York Times, and the typical spectrum of other outlets.
Sean knew that the media had opted for the unelectable narrative for Sanders, and they had done so since before the Senator had thrown his hat into the ring. At first, the DNC and liberal intellectual narrative had been that, rather than critique Clinton or threaten to run as a third-party candidate on a Socialist ticket, he should challenge her in the primaries. So Sanders had done so. At first, those same outlets had considered Sanders a sideshow, no more of a challenge than Jim Webb. But Sanders had prevailed, he gained momentum and popularity, and he had managed to out-fundraise Clinton one quarter despite not having a SuperPAC and thus having to rely on micro-donations. Still, Clinton received broad Establishment support that permeated everything.
Such as Paul Krugman’s blog post.
It was too bad, since Sean respected the man as an economist. But he had engaged in the same hand-wringing over Obama back in 2007 and 2008.
The telepath found it uncharacteristic that his partner would refuse to watch the caucus results. While he knew that Josh felt so passionately about politics that he could fall into a funk (although, so often, it ignited a fire in the attorney’s belly so that he argued and yelled instead), the attorney remained a political junkie. Anyone who had ever shared more than a five-minute conversation with him knew that.
If he wins, do you want to have slept through it?
Sean (mostly) followed the same media that his partner did. Josh read blogs more frequently than the telepath did, and he read (and replied to) the comments section, something that the psychiatrist would never do, but, overall, they had the same preferences for media: MSNBC, Mother Jones, The New York Times, and the typical spectrum of other outlets.
Sean knew that the media had opted for the unelectable narrative for Sanders, and they had done so since before the Senator had thrown his hat into the ring. At first, the DNC and liberal intellectual narrative had been that, rather than critique Clinton or threaten to run as a third-party candidate on a Socialist ticket, he should challenge her in the primaries. So Sanders had done so. At first, those same outlets had considered Sanders a sideshow, no more of a challenge than Jim Webb. But Sanders had prevailed, he gained momentum and popularity, and he had managed to out-fundraise Clinton one quarter despite not having a SuperPAC and thus having to rely on micro-donations. Still, Clinton received broad Establishment support that permeated everything.
Such as Paul Krugman’s blog post.
It was too bad, since Sean respected the man as an economist. But he had engaged in the same hand-wringing over Obama back in 2007 and 2008.